12 Oct 2026

Industry Groups Raise Alarm Over Proposed Hike in Machine Games Duty

UK betting shops and gaming machines in a modern arcade setting with slot terminals and staff

Executives and trade bodies have issued direct warnings to UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves ahead of the October 28 Budget, urging her not to lift Machine Games Duty on slots and gaming machines to 40 percent; they point to modelling that forecasts up to 16,000 job losses along with the potential closure of nearly 1,500 betting shops and 34 casinos, while also projecting a net reduction in overall Treasury receipts once secondary effects are taken into account.

The concerns arrive against a backdrop of earlier tax adjustments, including the scheduled increase of Remote Gaming Duty to 40 percent from April 2026, which operators say has already prompted reviews of capital investment and staffing levels across the land-based sector.

Details of the Warning and Supporting Analysis

Industry representatives argue that an MGD rise would compound cost pressures at a time when many venues operate on thin margins; they reference an EY analysis commissioned by the Betting and Gaming Council that models reduced player volumes, lower machine utilisation and accelerated venue closures if the duty moves to 40 percent, producing the cited employment and site-loss figures.

Those figures also indicate that lost corporation tax, business rates and supply-chain activity could outweigh any immediate duty gain, leaving the Exchequer with a smaller total contribution from the sector once the full economic ripple is measured.

Broader Tax Environment and Sector Pressures

Operators have already absorbed several fiscal changes in recent years, and the Remote Gaming Duty adjustment set for April 2026 is described by the BGC as the latest in a sequence that has shifted the overall tax burden higher; against that sequence, an MGD increase to 40 percent is presented as a further step that risks tipping marginal locations into loss-making territory.

High-street betting shops and smaller casino sites are singled out in the modelling as especially exposed because a large share of their revenue still flows through physical gaming machines rather than online channels, making any duty rise on those machines a direct hit to daily cash flow.

Group of industry executives and trade representatives discussing gambling policy documents in a meeting room

The Save Our Bets Campaign and Public Messaging

The Betting and Gaming Council has framed its response through the ongoing “Save Our Bets” campaign, which highlights employment numbers, community venues and tax contributions while calling for a stable fiscal regime; the current warnings about MGD sit within that wider effort to keep the October 28 Budget from introducing further rate changes that the campaign characterises as unsustainable.

Campaign materials include venue-level data showing average machine yields per site and the proportion of staff costs tied directly to those yields, data that the BGC says demonstrates why a 40 percent duty rate would force rapid contraction rather than gradual adjustment.

Projected Employment and Venue Impacts

Under the 40 percent scenario the EY modelling estimates that around 1,500 betting shops could become unviable within two years, with a further 34 casinos facing closure because their machine estates would no longer cover fixed costs once duty is applied at the higher rate; the job-loss total of 16,000 encompasses roles in venue operations, maintenance, security and supply firms that service the machines.

Those projections also incorporate regional variation, noting that coastal and smaller-town locations with fewer alternative employment options would feel the effects more sharply than major city centres.

Conclusion

The October 28 Budget therefore sits at a point where government revenue targets intersect with sector viability concerns; the warnings delivered by industry groups rest on specific employment and fiscal-impact figures derived from the EY analysis, figures that the BGC has placed before Treasury officials as part of its pre-Budget submissions. Whether those figures alter the final duty decision remains to be seen, yet the modelling and the accompanying “Save Our Bets” messaging now form part of the documented record ahead of the announcement.